New Stuff

IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT KIM GENTES MOVIE REVIEWS

The appearance of a movie in this review journal does not mean that the movie is endorsed by Kim.  He writes reviews of movies that he saw that he recommends people avoid as well as movies that he considers worth seeing.  Aside from just critical approval regarding the film, some movies may not be suitable for you or your family.  You must make that kind of determination on your own, and stay true to your own convictions on what is appropriate to see.  Some movies are well made, but have offensive or difficult subject matter that is questionable to many viewers. Again, the reviews listed here should not be your only filter for whether or not a film is appropriate for you and and your family.

Additionally, Kim has his own view on what movies are and why he thinks they are a worthwhile aspect of current culture to be investigated.  You certainly don't have to agree with Kim on his viewpoints of movies, and he would be surprised if you did.

Kim's thoughts on movies -

Movies are the modern art "experience" of our culture. They are transmitted in many forms, on screens in theatres, DVDs, television and even computers. They are the merge of classical theatrical acting and modern day technical set and experience creation (effects). The reason I enjoy and watch lots of movies is that they not only entertain, they communicate the nuances of our society. Of course, some have nothing to do with culture, its just greedy corporations trying to produce profits. I am a guy, and as such am not the ideal audience for romantic comedies or 'chick fliks'. However I am also a husband, and domestic bliss (as well as common sense) compels me to at least review them...occasionally.  For the most part, you will find I like (and therefor review a lot of ) action, drama, science fiction, suspense and similarly themed movies.

Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005)

wallaceandgromit_finalposter.jpgEnchanting and welcome

Overall Grade:B+
Story:B+
Acting:A-
Direction:B+
Visuals:A

Having children can mean that mean that parents are subjected to many degrees of pain. One of those can be the humourless gimmicks that Hollywood prys into childrens minds with catchy music and annoying characters in movies. Original movies like Toy Story and Chicken Run helped cartoon makers see the possibility of witty dialog, that kept the parents interest, while entertaining the kids. But of late, so many children's animation movies have become a formulaic rant on that theme- enamor the children with slap-bop humor and quiet the parents with over-the-kids-head puns and innuendo. Madagascar, the Incredibles, and other recent releases have made the trek to the theatre with the kids a tiring and annoying one for the parents. Worse still is having the kids return home and recite movie lines that were a worse dialog than any parent would teach their child.

Enter Wallace and Gromit. The simplicity of the animation (the crisp marriage of clamation and animatics) is refreshing as a visual setting and enjoyable as the textures and movements are uniquely non CGI, yet magically other-worldly and childish. The dialog is markedly clean and innocent (save 3 errant lines that should have been erased), drawing you into the vegetable loving world of the two heros. British in its origin, the setting and characters are both simple and warmhearted. No one will go away with darkened views of humanity after seeing this film. And its a nice reprieve for everyone. The kids enjoy a great romp of wonderment in a new world of fun with Wallace and Gromit, and the parents are happily laughing along with the clean fun of a man and his dog trying the save a kind village from a giant rabbit eating up all their prized vegetables.

Well, almost. I so much wanted to give this movie an A rating, as the writing is brilliant but not flashy. The visuals are a breath of fresh air in an overstimulated CGI world. And the characters are mild and thoughtful, but not overly talkative. But director/writers Steve Box and Nick Park run sharply awry in 3 scenes where they try to "americanize" the film by adding crude sexual innuendo, hoping to make the parents laugh in the film. It really wasn't needed, and we were all laughing right along without it. That act alone caused me to lower the rating to a B+ from a A-. They were very close in every aspect, at getting a full A, but floundered in trying to pander too much to the American crowd with those ill-guided lines.

Still, the children in the crowd will not get the references until they are over 10 years old, so its a safe bet that you won't have a problem with your kids asking questions about this unless you tell them what just happened.

The movie, other than that, is delightful, and probably the best kids movie to come along in animation for many years. If you have kids, this is an absolute must see. It would have made classic status had they clean up the few lines, but it is easily the best children's movie your kids will see in the last couple years.

Enjoy it!

Fantastic Four (2005)

fantasticfour_releaseposter.jpgFlame ON!! It's Clobberin' time at the freak show!

Overall Grade:B-
Story:B
Acting:B-
Direction:B-
Visuals:B

Back in the day, we didn't have all these fancy computers and stuff. But if we did, you can bet that Johnny Storm may well have been the first "flamer" in cyberspace. In Fantastic Four, Johnny (the Human Torch), Susan (Johnny's sister and "Invisible Girl"), Reed Richards (the super stretching Mr. Fantastic) and Ben Grimm (the Thing) play scientist-types who get irradiated by a strange space storm, while they are out on a orbitting space station.

Of course, like Spiderman, Hulk and others from the Marvel Universe of characters (all brought to life in comics by a man named Stan Lee) radiation somehow has the magical quality of turning your average joe into a superhero. If it were only that easy! While Fantastic Four has the catchy wit and human touch of the comic book of its namesake, the movie version has a few drawbacks that are apparant whether you are a comic geek or just a movie watcher. But even with its failures, F4 delivers a fun time of good ole fasion super butt-kickin.

The bonus's in this film are first that it is light hearted, and it doesn't try to convince you otherwise. These are comic book hero's folks, not detectives and war heros- they create a surreal story in a hero-lacking world. The laugh lines keep coming, and the director clearly doesn't want you worried too much about the science or the plot. Because of this, you don't get carried away with trying to make sure it all fits together, or that the screen writers tied the plot together. You sit back, and enjoy the "encounters" as each seen things get more and more dramatic.

After the accident that empowers our new hero's each of them begin to discover their new powers in very human, but supernatural ways- much like Toby McGuire did in the original Spiderman movie. But here, the F4 crew aren't given character development. A few stereotypes are cast and your off to the races. We don't find out alot anyone here, because the film is about action and fun. Likewise, the intensity of the topics and seriousness of situations is much lighter than the forboding discrimination-laced X-men movies (another Stan Lee creation).

The film fails with the Dr. Doom character, however, in that neither the acting nor the costume and dialog of Julian McMahon's character brings the comic book Doom to the movie. Even the voice seems weak and threatless.

The jokes are pretty shallow, but they keep you chuckling, and the action is fun. Don't go to this film for a deep contemplation, but at least you won't have to leave your brain at the door. There are no stupid science flaws here, partly because they don't try to convince you with psuedo science all about what happened. They throw out a few theories and just let you basically think radiation mutated folks into super-dudes (and one dudette). Works for me.

I liked that the cast was basically second teir names, since it made the film void of the talent posturing that happens in Hollow-wood these days. Grufudd is a convincingly brilliant and moronically emotionless Reed Richards. One would have to wonder if he went a little too far in playing a character that can't take hint after hint from the beautiful Jessica Alba falling all over him- this is what truly convinced me that Mr. Fantastic was not a real human! Jessica Alba shows both a surprising energy on the screen and her stunning beauty isn't hid away behind invisibility. It is good to see Michael Chilkis play a character that is not so intense (he is known for his role as police officer Vic Mackey on the drama "The Shield"). Chris Evans basically plays Chris Evans in another shallow self absorbed role, all of which fits the Human Torch character to the tee.

A fun movie with no sex, plenty of non-gore violence, and scenes that would only scare relatively immature children (7 or under should probably not see this film).

 

The Perfect Man (2005)

theperfectman_releaseposter.jpgSurprise, its not lame! Actual dialog & thought!

Overall Grade:B-
Story:B
Acting:B
Direction:C
Visuals:C

We all have gone down this road. We went to a romantic movie with our spouse or date, but secretly we expected it to follow the formulaic, sappy and Hollywood Cinderella way of all romantic comedies. "The Perfect Man" starts off looking so much like it will be the standard story of longed-for romance of a waiting beauty that you don't expect it to be an actual story about people, let alone a family.

Heather Locklear and Hillary Duff are not two people I ever dreamed I would be talking about making a movie I liked, but I enjoyed this film. I think it appealed to me initially because it opened up a conversation about single mom's raising their families. But in a larger scale, the film is about integrity and the relationship between a parent and children. Don't get me wrong, it's not a deep film that examines issues to change society. But what it does talk about, it does so using good dialog with some well-spoken key moments. All my guy friends will laugh at me actually liking this movie, but I found it enjoyable.

Chris Noth adds his cool personality to the film and makes it reasonable. From the plot side of things, you will be surprised at the fact that this story doesn't resolve like you expect. I was glad to see the morality lesson being taught here actually stick, though a little twist at the end threw a flaw in the story which was the only problem I had with the film. If honesty was the message, they really shouldn't resolve the plot by relying on dishonesty, don't ya think?

Anyways, the story was good, and you will enjoy it. Probably a better DVD rental than big screen date.

War of the Worlds (2005)

waroftheworlds_finalposter.jpgUnstoppable Alien Invasion vs. Jerry McGuire

Overall Grade:A-
Story:B+
Acting:B+
Direction:A
Visuals:A+


Meet Ray (Tom Cruise). He is the knowningly disconnected father who, though he is street smart, lacks the common sense not belittle his teenage son or keep even basic food in the house. You start off really disliking Ray, as he gets his two children for the weekend from his ex-wife, Mary Ann. You might even despise him.

But in about 10 minutes your disposition against Ray will evaporate, as you cling to your neighbors seat and hold on for the most gripping realism based effects ever put to screen. Cruise learns quickly that alien machines are coming up out of the ground and literally distintigrating people and destroying everything. It soon becomes evident that the battle scenes aren't local, and you realize that whole world is under seige. With virtually no electronic devices or electricity usable, the cities shut down and fear takes hold of everyone.

The effects are not even describeable. You will lose perception of what is real and what is effects while you are watching this film. Buildings, freeways, vehicles fly through the air, whilst gigantic alien machines crush and "shoot" (with a distintigrating "ray" that is a very cool effect) everything in their paths. The aliens don't seem to have much of a plan, other than just whipe out everyone. The story is very straightforward and doesn't veer off into a director's fest- instead Speilberg takes the job of trying to simply tell the story of War of the Worlds, keeping all the major plot items intact.

And while the plot is good, Speilberg makes this movie about people and families, not aliens and invasion. Like every movie he does, this directory wraps our reality into his film and you immediately recognize the film as something near your home, your neighborhood, friends, and family. Cruise's character turns his self-protective and selfish character from brutish father into caring patriarch. But the transformation is not without pain. Encountering peril after peril, him and his children survive through cunning and luck to live another moment. Eventually, they run into the most gripping character in the movie, played by Tim Robbins. Robbins does an exceptional job playing the wacked out, and isolated renegade who will try to take on the aliens by himself, and you wonder if Ray and Rachel (Dakota Fanning) are safer facing the aliens than with this nutjob (you'd be right!).

The dark irony of Ray protecting his child while doing something horrible, is the tension of survival that Speilberg inserts poignantly into various places in this film. It happens once when their car is assaulted by others fighting for transportation, and another time behind a closed door with Robbins character.

Slowly Ray learns the lessons of his own decisions causing unspeakable hurt. Fanning is not just a pretentious little girl in this film, she is downright obnoxious. I can't say she is completely over the top (I mean, heck if the world was getting destroyed by aliens all around, I suppose a 8 year old girl might be freaking out), but the constant scream and freak show by Fanning was the only thing that actually distracts you from watching this great movie.

The final outcome is for you to see, and it is well done. But what happens in this film is covering for the family story Speilberg is telling here about people growing up, and about how humanity makes decisions about each others lives, and will trade one for another, if it comes to it. Cruise character moves from bad dad to Michael Landon wise by the end of the film, and you actually believe it-- its too bad the rest of us guys don't have an alien invasion to teach us to be better fathers. Then again, maybe not.

Don't miss this film on the big screen. There is no way you will believe the imagery in this film until you see it. It's even more horrifying and real than StarWars III because, unlike Lucas' recent masterpeice, what happens here is on a very real, very touchable earth, where real people (not Jedi Knights) die-- and you feel it.

Do NOT bring the kids to this film. No one under 12 should see this violence and fear.

A new epic. Really!

 

Bewitched (2005)

bewitched_earlyposter.jpgFerrell & Kidman: cheerful and witless magic

Overall Grade:C
Story:C
Acting:C
Direction:D
Visuals:C+


First off, let me say that I enjoyed this movie as just a good time of laughing. The problem was, I kept looking for a good plot, or deeper character portrayal, and that somewhat derailed me for just kicking back and taking it as a simply comedy. The jokes are shallow, but very funny, and thankfully not in ill-taste. In fact, I found this a very refreshing script, in terms of its cleanliness from sex induced humor. That isn't to say they don't have any sexual references, but there is no Saturday Night Live dialog here, and it serves the TV going audience an appropriate meal of humor they would expect.

Ferrell does a very good job with his lines, especially delivering the surprised and dumb-founded moments in the film. He hasn't been this funny since Elf. It works well and you enjoy it.

But the film has drawbacks. The plot, while clever (a movie about a real witch who gets involved with a remake of Bewitched, a TV program about a witch in suburban america). It sounds more confusing than it is, and the idea has some good traction. But the reuse of characters gets old and the lack of devotion to a clear plot leaves you feeling like they had no story to hang these good jokes and two good perfomances on.

While Ferrell and Kidman do very good jobs with their characters, remaining casting is fair to bleak. Michael Caine plays the warlock father of Kidman, and while he never misplays his roll, he isn't given much to work with but evil fatherly advice. Shirley McClain plays the mother of Kidman's TV character and she does just about everything she can to ruin the movie including dispassionate delivery of her lines and ruthless grandstanding, which is actually written into the script. McClain should have been shown out on audition of this film as she ruins every scene she tries to be a part of including an advice session with Kidman. Beyond that, the supporting cast goes from bad to worse with the assistants and stage hands of the "Bewitched" studio set being one horribly cast stereotype after another.

The movie was funny, but without Kidman and Ferrell it would have never even reached the theatres. More duet scenes with just them would have been just fine. The film wasn't the "magic" the studios would like it to be, but it is worth seeing, at least on rental if not on the screen.